A True History of The Isles Vol II Chapter 5- The Status of Women in the Middle-High-Middle Ages.

In this chapter we shall take a break off from kings, conniving nobles, fussy church folk and those who liked to pretend they were any of the aforementioned and consider the status of Women in the Medieval era. The reasons for this lurch is that we have just left Edward II who may or may have not been killed by nobles, but there seems to be a common misconception even to this day at that at the bottom of his fall was his cold cruel wife Isabella of France who being a mere woman also fell under the spell of wicked Roger Mortimer.

At this stage, the author of this work would like to say ‘Oh! Grow up!’

So, let us look at the matter in more detail.

The Basic Details

Women suffered from a bad press. Men in general, irrespective of intelligence and education were not inclined to understand the poetical and allegorical nature of parts of the Old Testament of the Bible so blamed women for Eve, or vice versa (it was a source of great theological debate). Also, if they did get around to reading stuff from the Elderly Greeks and Roman which of course had to be classical, these works were all about men apart with a few devious or hysterical women thrown in for dramatic effect; these works being written by men. It was thus concluded women were weak, devious, incapable of thought, emotional and not to be trusted out of your sight.

The fact that this could be applied in equal measure to your average male, in particularly the nobility and the higher officers of The Church was of course blamed on outside influences, especially women.

Thus, women were allowed only to get married and have children, or failing that enter convents. For anything else they had to have the permission of their fathers, brothers or husbands. If they insisted on surviving all male relatives then they were expected to marry the nearest available male. If he was already married she would have to seek another male; the one exception being the nobility; they were allowed to ask a bishop to find out a reason why the current marriage was illegal, immoral or inconvenient.

The Social Structure

Peasant Women.

These had less rights than their male counterparts, which was a bit of a problem seeing as in practice the male peasant was quite devoid of any rights. The law could be very harsh; if it was found out a woman had a child out of marriage, some male peasant had to pay a large fine to the local lord, irrespective if the lord was the father of said child. In addition to having children, cooking and keeping the hovel free of rats, they were also expected to work in the fields, forest etc. Those who survived all this to the ripe old age of thirty-five might be suspected of witchcraft.

Something More Than Peasant Women, Women

Although their status was something similar to Peasant Women, due to legal loopholes some women could keep some of their own property and income. They could also organise their own businesses, as long as a man knew about it. Women could be brewers or butchers, until men started to get queasy about the concept of that the person who brewed their ale could also wield a large axe.

Women Whose Husbands Were Commoners But Wealthy.

Whereas these women were still expected to produce children, they could have servants to boss about. When The Old Man was away for some reason, The Wife was expected to run his business. Sometimes the community and business partners found out she could do a better job than he could and his return might be difficult. Sometimes robbers waylaid him and no questions were asked.

Women With Titles

Generally, a daughter was set up to marry someone by the age they were four. The whole business being to organise alliances between families and of course produce male children. If they survived this they might be chosen to be lesser lady to some higherborn noble woman and either be loyal or insufferable if they were older than the said higherborn. Having a title allowed them at any stage to say they wanted to be a nun and get out of the whole messy business. There were many convents in those days.

Noble Women

Noble women basically had to have male children. If they didn’t it was their fault. If the poor mite died it was their fault. If the kid grew up and became a disappointment it was his fault. The father always wriggled out of the deal.

Very noble women were allowed to rule while their husband was off making a nuisance of himself somewhere or other. This was known as a regency and was a status not a style of ornate fashion. They usually ruled quite well and this was very unsettling for their hubby when he came back. They were also allowed to accompany their husbands on a crusade, whether they wanted to or not. Some were even more noble about it than their husbands. Therefore, it can be seen why some nobles felt more comfortable with their fluffy young mistresses.

Despite every male telling every other male that this was the one time they should listen to the teaching of The Church, there was still the sneaking suspicion that some women were alarmingly capable.

In England whereas the nobility had recovered from the shock of the Age of Matlhildas & Matildas (See Vol I King Stephen), there was still the worrying evidence that The Eleanors were still prevalent. Everyone still remembered how Eleanor of Provence had been worryingly more capable than husband Henry (III and a bit weak and wet) no matter how rude they were about her. Then the Dynamic Edward the I (and very grim) was supported by and so fond of Eleanor of Castile that he didn’t bother with mistresses and mourned her when she died (the fact that she was a canny and ruthless property dealer suggests he, being an invader and subjugator found she was of a like mind and therefore the ideal wife and helpmate). Naturally as both women were intelligent, well read, and capable they were not popular with the nobility who told their peasants why they should think the same way, but neither woman came as close to vilifications as……

Isabella of France (some time in 1295 – 22 August 1358), Edward II’s wife. As it will have been noted in the previous chapter being married to an Edward The II could not have been easy. Isabella and Peers Gaveston (Favourite the I) did try to work together by being so complicated that the barons never knew whether they liked or didn’t like each other. In 1311 she went with Edward on his campaign against the Scots and thanks to Edward nearly was captured by the Scots which did cause some marital strain. After Gaveston was murdered by Lancaster (the noble not the city) or welshmen she did try to raise Edward’s spirits by giving birth to a son. But this didn’t work as he lost a little war to the Barons and then the Scots and Isabella was nearly captured by both. Even if she did give birth to another son, it must be assumed some of the glamour was fading from the marriage, particularly as she, like the rest of the country suffered from the Dispensers. And around this time thanks once more to Edward’s ineptitude was nearly captured by the Scots again!

By now understandably fed up of Dispensers, Scots, Barons and Edward she fled to France where in order to invade England she and Roger Mortimer became lovers, raised troops, invaded England, dispensed with the Despensers and probably enabled Edward to flee England as live and uncomplicated life. She then made a big mistake of trying to rule England with Mortimer without being Just, Fair and Noble and was duly removed justly, fairly and nobly by her son Edward (the soon to be III), though the same courtesy was not extended to Mortimer.

Although she’d been instrumental in getting rid of the hated Dispensers and shoving her hapless and inept husband off of the throne because she was a woman and not allowed to do such things she was thence vilified. Had she been a man she would have simply been a chapter. Of course Christopher Marlowe’s play ‘Edward II’ has not helped, as there are folk who will take plays as actually history. There again being a character in a Christopher Marlowe play is hardly helpful to anyone’s public image.     

Women Who Took Up A Religious Life

Some of course did this out of conviction, others having seen what happened to mothers, elder sisters, cousins and so forth were quick to hitch up their skirts and scamper off to the nearest convent. This was the one course of action a woman could take without men interfering, as to do this might incur the Attention of The Church, which no one really wanted. This is only mentioned to illustrate the option and will be looked into in more detail in a separate chapter of The Church and other religious aspects.

A medieval singlewoman

This was not a unit of counting the population for statistical purposes, but a woman who was not married without being a widow or religious. Usually without a family they were obliged to find their own dowry. This being a system whereby the family of the woman paid a large sum of money for someone to marry her; today there are many parents of teenage daughters who wished this was still common practice. The Singlewoman was obliged to save up for her own dowry, which in some cases could be a pretty good excuse for putting off the event. There were also women who didn’t bother with such trifling excuses, such as Cecilia Penifader of Brigstock (1295–1344) who made a announcement she would remain unwed, whether this was made as a statement with dignity or followed by a vulgar noise has not been recorded, but she has had a book written about her and lived beyond 30 years of age.

Women of Low Virtue

This only applied to women who did not have titles or of nobility. These lower class women were naturally called whores and other demeaning names, which didn’t stop brothels from making money. This class of women couldn’t have been that ill-considered as their testimony in court was valid, particularly if it was embarrassing to some fellow whose rivals were sharp operators.

To say a woman of high birth was as such, was simply asking for you to get to suffer pain in all sorts of manners, unless of course you were a noble yourself and she was involved with a rival. Normally women in such circumstances were known as mistresses and were generally approved of particularly by wives who hadn’t cared for their husbands in the first place. As long as they didn’t try and influence him politically mistresses of kings were very much accepted, particularly if you were lucky enough for your wife to be one; this opened all sorts of doors for you. Sometimes the children of such relationships muddied the accession circumstance, but some nobles found this a useful way of upsetting rivals or even creating a Pretender to the throne; otherwise they were called Fitz-something and given some land somewhere and told not to get involved in anything.


Whether men liked it or not some measure of education was necessary so that wives could look after things when The Old Man was somewhere else. Some nobles insisted their daughters were very well educated not just to impress others, but so they could spy on their husbands for Dad. Some miserable types complained that if women could write they would spend their time sending passionate letters to lovers. These were just sour-pusses because they didn’t get any of that type of letter.

The Church was naturally suspicious, but grudgingly accepted nuns who could write, just so long as they wrote favorable comments about Christianity and more importantly The Church. Any women who started to speculate about questions of theology were looked upon with concern for the sin of Female Independent Thinking and would be made to submit their work to a Bishop who would then get picky about their use of Latin Grammar.


This will be looked at in more detail in that separate chapter on The Church. Suffice it to say The Church with its Eve fixation was very suspicious of Women as being weak, devious, lascivious and other words they could fit into Latin. Generally, there were two schools of thought:

Younger members of The Church having read Genesis feared that women would either leap at them and tear off their clothes to force their attentions upon them, or by seductive female means would achieve the same end. It was best therefore if women were not allowed to do anything outside of the house, and religious men should only go into the houses when other men were there. These men also kept their bedroom doors locked, just in case.

Elderly members of The Church had the same opinions, they were of a grumpy stony outlook because in all their years they had never been in such dangers and thought that ‘typical’ or whatever Latin word they cared to use. They had given up locking their bedroom doors      

Some members of The Church had more moderate outlooks. They also kept their bedroom doors locked, for quite different reasons.


Noble women often gathered or led armies when The Old Man was either doing that somewhere else or the fool had got himself captured. A few women were quite good at it, though men did not care to see it that way (See Vol 1- The Matildas). The English had had a narrow squeak with a welsh princess Gwenllian ferch Gruffydd earlier on in 1100-1136 who used to go around with her husband sharing raids and chopping Anglo-Normans to bits, but generally in this era in these Isles women did not often get involved with handing out the business end of sharp bits of metal; unless of course they were legendary. Whether any independently minded young women disguised themselves as boys, went off to war and subsequently unsettled hardened leaders of men who found themselves strangely attracted to the new lad is a matter to writers of fiction.


These days, although some men won’t admit it, they yearn for these simpler times, and have to be more subtle and inventive; unless of course they are morons in which case they say they are exercising they right to free-speech (and presumably exercising something else, which is why they keep their bedroom doors locked).


In the next Chapter we shall consider the Vigorous Edward III, which will no doubt be of relief to those male readers who are insecure (work it out for yourself for pity’s sake man!)

Edward II, And What Others Did About Him 

A True History of the Isles Part 21- 1135-1154 Who Is Who and Who is in Charge of England Anyhow?

A True History of The Isles Part 27-Eleanor of Aquitaine-Yes Mam! No Mam! At Once Mam!



16 thoughts on “A True History of The Isles Vol II Chapter 5- The Status of Women in the Middle-High-Middle Ages.

  1. I have scoured my memory of medieval history study and cannot find an ailment of that age called ‘Dispenser.’ You have me stumped. Distemper? No, that’s dogs. Dysentery? well considering hygiene in those days, a distinct possibility. Also, regarding dowries, this practice was of more significance that is often imagined. In Celtic Brehon law, the dowry came from the male, not the female. The reversal, putting the onus on a woman’s family, was useful in stripping wealth from a noble family with only a female heir.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Dermott.
      Welcome to my less than serious account of the History of ‘These Isles’. All crafted in a homage to ‘1066 and All That’.
      The reference to the Dispenser is a warping of the notoriously grasping and malevolent Despenser (or to be precise le Despenser) family who held much influence over Edward II and arguably resulted in his downfall.
      In the spirit of my work, nothing is accurate and wild assumptions are made (one of the sub-texts being satire on some of the ‘bad’ history churned out).
      This is Volume II; Volume I was remarkably successful in that I have sold in the past six months six copies, which is an all-time record!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thanks Dermott.
        Although the whole series is tongue-set-in-cheek, to make that work some research has to be done. No doubt there were some very capable, intelligent and bold women about.
        From one viewpoint, albeit simplified: The era of The Anarchy in Stephen the I’s reign would appear funny but for the misery caused by the nobility. Imagine Stephen’s main rival is Matilda(ex-empress) daughter of Henry I; Stephen is captured, his wife also named Matilda (of Boulogne) takes up his cause, meanwhile Matilda (ex-empress)’s husband manages to get captured too! So we have two Matilda’s technically battling for the crown of England; though as a salve to male pride they negotiate releases of the respective spouses.
        It would be worthy of an Ealing or Carry-On comedy if it wasn’t for the bloodshed.


  2. How on earth did I get so far behind??? Sigh. Burning the candle at both ends, and still, I am behind on one of my most favourite writers. I debated … go back and work my way up to today’s posts, or pick up here and try to catch up on the ones I missed later? I decided to pick up here, so I can (hopefully) keep up going forward, but you and I both know that is probably a pipe dream. I have ordered my extra 4 hours per day, but they have yet to be delivered. Anyway … fun and education mixed in this chapter, as always, and I enjoyed this immensely … NEEDED this! Now … as to the content, I have …

    … A few late-night thoughts …
    I am glad I was not born into Edwardian England, at least, not as a woman. Methinks I would not have fared well at all, at all. I can almost hear them now … “OFF with her head, drive a stake through her heart, for she MUST be a witch!!!

    What is the difference between a Noble Woman, and a Very Noble Woman?

    I once, as a child of about 10, was convinced that becoming a nun was the best of all worlds (I envisioned sitting around in a quiet spot, reading all day, singing sometimes, and never being beaten up!) and exactly what I hoped to do with my life! But then, a few short years later, I discovered the opposite gender was actually good for something besides playing football with, and … well, the dreams of wearing a habit and going quietly about good works vanished … POOF … into oblivion. However, had I been born into the era of which you write … I’d have stuck with the ecclesiastic life.

    And then there’s this business of a dowry. Now why, if I’m going to clean the cottage, keep the rats at bay, cook the food, wash the clothes by beating them on rocks down at the stream, keep providing more and more boy-children, sew the clothes, darn the socks, and tend the bloomin’ fire, then WHY should I have to PAY some man for the privilege of doing all those things?

    I do love to read your writings, my friend, and can only wish that I either have more time or become more efficient somehow. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi there Jill.
      I’m glad you enjoyed it.
      I loved the part about your ambitions as a child and then…Oooh those pesky hormones eh?
      Nobles Woman and A Very Noble Woman are my way of distinguishing between:
      (a) Women who came from families whose top man had only made it as far as being ‘Lord’ or ‘Sir’ Fiddle-Dee-Dee of SludgeHampton. They were at the bottom of the titled pile
      (b) Very Noble Women were the daughters, or husbands of the scions of successful families of crooks, brown-nosers, backstabbers etc who’d got to be Dukes, Earls etc.

      On the grim side at the lower ends a woman would be likely to only get as far as 35. Hence the theory amongst social historians that girls did genuinely opt for a cloistered life, although probably not cynically as in ‘yeh. y’know, whatever’ but more as the better and more rewarding choice.

      As always of course hypocrisy played a large part in the treatment of women…..but things are better today …….
      Sort of????🙄 🤔

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Ah, thanks for the clarification of noble vs very noble women! The hierarchy of wealth and power. Makes me think I’m glad enough to have neither wealth nor power. I get to just be … me! 🙃

        35 eh? Like as not, after all those years of being a subservient and dedicated slave … er, wife … she was probably grateful to be put out of her misery!

        Better today? Oh yes, definitely! Granted, there are still issues of equality in pay and the workplace, but those will gradually come ’round. I can truthfully say that I have never felt discriminated against because of my gender. Sure, I have run into some boors who thought any woman would be grateful for their unwarranted advances, but it’s easy enough to put them in their place. Funny aside … I married young, 19, and had no idea how to be a wife … I actually did not even know that toilets had to be cleaned! So about 2 weeks into the marriage, my husband came home from work, sat me down and said, “my job is to go out and earn the living. Your job is to keep the house clean and cook the meals.” I will never forget that conversation, for by the time he finished cleaning his supper from his head, he had learned a valuable lesson and we never had THAT discussion again! 😀

        But yes, thiings are better now. I would not have done well back in those days, I think.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Beware, my friend … ‘yes dear’ can get you in a heap of trouble! 😀 It’s all about tone of voice. If we think it’s obvious that you are saying ‘yes dear’ just in order to shut us up … LOOK OUT!!! 😀 😀 😀

        Liked by 1 person

      3. I got the tone!! 😄In fact I have the tonez!
        The ‘Yes I am listening’
        The ‘Yes. I’ll do that next/now’
        The sympathetic
        The sharing the joke
        The ‘Yes I was wrong’
        The intense agreement.
        The ‘really I didn’t know that’
        I know what’s good for me y’know 😁

        Liked by 1 person

      4. WOW, Roger, you have an entire repertoire! Perhaps you would be willing to have a little talk with Herb? 😀 You’ve obviously learned much in your years of marriage … your wife deserves a medal! 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s